H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:17 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Flavio Cobolli H2H: 2-1
Daniil Medvedev holds a 2–1 lead over Flavio Cobolli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Flavio Cobolli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flavio Cobolli won the 2026 Mutua Madrid Open fourth round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | Mutua Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Flavio Cobolli | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2024* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-4 | Flavio Cobolli | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Flavio Cobolli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Flavio Cobolli | #9 | #9 | 3,540 | 1,977 | 95 | 74 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Flavio Cobolli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #101 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,886 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #22 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2026 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #9 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |