H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Hamad Medjedovic H2H: 1-1
Daniil Medvedev and Hamad Medjedovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay, while Hamad Medjedovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hamad Medjedovic won the 2025 Grand Prix Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes semifinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Serbia
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2025* | Grand Prix Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Hamad Medjedovic | 6-3 6-2 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| May 13, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(5) 2-6 7-5 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Hamad Medjedovic | #69 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daniil Medvedev | Hamad Medjedovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2026 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |