H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Learner Tien H2H: 1-3
Learner Tien holds a 3–1 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Learner Tien leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Learner Tien won the 2026 Australian Open fourth round 6-4 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
United States
Age 20
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Learner Tien | 6-4 6-0 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2025* | Rolex Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6 6-7 6-4 | Learner Tien | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2025* | China Open | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Learner Tien | 5-7 7-5 4-0 (ret.) | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2025* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Learner Tien | 6-3 7-6 6-7 1-6 7-6 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Learner Tien | #15 | #15 | 2,290 | 1,949 | 51 | 40 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Learner Tien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #860 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #122 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #28 | 1,860 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #15 | 1,883 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |