H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniil Medvedev vs Marin Cilic H2H: 4-1

Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–1 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on grass, while Marin Cilic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2026 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniil Medvedev
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniil Medvedev #9 6-1 6-2 6-4 Marin Cilic #62 Match data Jun 29, 2026 R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Daniil Medvedev #8 6-2 3-6 6-1 Marin Cilic #47 Match data Jun 13, 2026 QF Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Marin Cilic #23 6-2 6-3 6-2 Daniil Medvedev #2 Match data May 31, 2022* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Daniil Medvedev #2 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 Marin Cilic #37 Match data Jul 4, 2021* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Daniil Medvedev #10 6-4 7-6(7) Marin Cilic #17 Match data Aug 2, 2019* QF Washington Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniil Medvedev #8 #1 10,780 2,280 434 187 69.9% 1 6 1 5 10 23
Marin Cilic #81 #3 5,155 2,199 578 350 62.3% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniil Medvedev Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,498 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 37–24 60.7% #23 1,908 0 1
20 2016 5–5 50.0% #99 1,685 0 0 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,991 0 3
21 2017 22–23 48.9% #65 1,739 0 0 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,856 0 5
22 2018 41–23 64.1% #16 2,033 0 3 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,966 0 6
23 2019 58–21 73.4% #5 2,126 0 7 2012 38–18 67.9% #15 2,004 0 8
24 2020 24–9 72.7% #4 2,180 0 9 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 2,005 0 9
25 2021 53–13 80.3% #2 2,239 1 13 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,130 1 13
26 2022 42–18 70.0% #7 2,060 1 15 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,064 1 14
27 2023 67–18 78.8% #3 2,161 1 20 2016 44–21 67.7% #6 2,135 1 16
28 2024 46–19 70.8% #5 2,090 1 20 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 2025 43–23 65.2% #13 1,950 1 21 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,053 1 18
30 2026 33–15 68.8% #8 1,885 1 23 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,912 1 18
31 — — — — — — — 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,841 1 18
32 — — — — — — — 2021 32–19 62.7% #30 1,928 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,953 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,933 1 20
35 — — — — — — — 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,827 1 21
36 — — — — — — — 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,825 1 21
37 — — — — — — — 2026 14–16 46.7% #81 1,748 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniil Medvedev Marin Cilic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2010 28 14 42 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2018 36 14 50 72.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 25 14 39 64.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2019 45 13 58 77.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 14 10 24 58.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
24 2020 24 7 31 77.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 14 6 20 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2021 41 8 49 83.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2014 37 13 50 74.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2022 31 13 44 70.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2015 21 10 31 67.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
27 2023 50 12 62 80.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2016 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 2024 29 12 41 70.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 19 15 34 55.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — —
29 2025 31 16 47 66.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2026 22 8 30 73.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 12 30 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 9 8 17 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 326 120 446 73.1% 51 39 90 56.7% 57 28 85 67.1% — — — — — 362 218 580 62.4% 128 91 219 58.4% 84 37 121 69.4% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 609/622 of Daniil Medvedev's and 909/929 of Marin Cilic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniil Medvedev Marin Cilic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 2.0 2.0 50.8% 56.3% 45.2% 20.0% 50.0% 50.8% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 14/14 5.4 3.5 54.6% 69.3% 48.4% 59.9% 29.1% 59.6% 34.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 24/24 7.0 3.5 52.6% 74.3% 48.5% 57.9% 51.0% 62.1% 36.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 59/61 9.3 3.3 53.6% 75.6% 53.2% 60.5% 38.4% 65.3% 37.5%
20 2016 10/10 5.4 2.0 59.9% 71.2% 46.0% 52.1% 43.8% 61.5% 42.0% 2009 65/65 7.8 2.7 56.6% 75.5% 53.6% 61.0% 38.2% 66.3% 40.0%
21 2017 45/45 7.3 4.0 60.6% 71.5% 49.0% 59.7% 42.9% 62.9% 35.4% 2010 59/59 7.2 2.5 58.1% 74.6% 53.5% 66.4% 43.0% 65.7% 38.0%
22 2018 63/64 6.8 3.8 57.6% 74.4% 51.1% 63.9% 41.2% 64.7% 36.9% 2011 62/63 7.0 2.6 54.7% 76.4% 54.7% 59.1% 44.6% 66.8% 38.3%
23 2019 79/79 8.7 3.2 59.8% 76.4% 55.9% 54.9% 45.9% 68.2% 41.2% 2012 54/56 6.2 2.7 55.5% 72.4% 53.2% 53.2% 46.7% 64.0% 40.4%
24 2020 33/33 9.4 2.6 61.6% 79.0% 55.4% 66.1% 44.5% 70.3% 40.1% 2013 36/37 8.4 2.4 56.4% 76.9% 57.0% 62.5% 43.3% 68.1% 38.6%
25 2021 62/66 9.5 3.0 62.7% 79.2% 54.1% 59.7% 46.6% 69.7% 41.8% 2014 71/72 10.4 2.8 56.9% 79.0% 50.9% 67.0% 39.5% 66.9% 38.0%
26 2022 60/60 9.2 4.0 64.6% 76.5% 51.3% 67.8% 47.6% 67.6% 40.6% 2015 54/54 12.0 2.6 58.8% 77.6% 52.0% 63.8% 41.8% 67.0% 36.8%
27 2023 84/85 7.0 4.1 64.5% 76.2% 50.8% 62.5% 46.8% 67.0% 41.5% 2016 62/65 10.4 2.4 55.4% 80.1% 54.7% 59.5% 40.4% 68.9% 37.1%
28 2024 62/65 6.9 4.8 61.2% 73.1% 49.9% 57.7% 46.1% 64.3% 39.9% 2017 64/65 11.3 3.1 58.5% 79.9% 54.9% 60.5% 42.7% 69.6% 39.7%
29 2025 64/66 8.3 4.3 62.3% 76.2% 51.4% 52.7% 38.3% 66.6% 40.6% 2018 58/59 10.2 3.1 58.8% 80.1% 55.1% 57.3% 40.3% 69.9% 38.1%
30 2026 47/49 7.7 4.1 65.3% 73.8% 48.4% 61.4% 43.2% 65.1% 40.9% 2019 41/42 9.7 5.0 58.3% 77.4% 47.7% 61.0% 41.9% 65.1% 35.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 21/22 10.0 3.8 59.8% 76.2% 50.1% 61.4% 33.4% 65.6% 35.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/51 11.1 3.9 58.2% 79.0% 49.9% 62.9% 38.5% 66.6% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/52 11.5 3.4 59.9% 78.9% 52.2% 61.1% 41.2% 68.0% 38.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/3 9.5 3.0 65.4% 71.9% 42.9% 64.6% 21.4% 62.6% 33.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 14/14 12.1 4.0 56.2% 77.9% 50.3% 59.7% 54.3% 65.8% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 19/19 8.7 2.8 57.0% 75.5% 50.9% 55.9% 35.8% 64.8% 30.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 29/31 9.1 3.2 58.6% 76.8% 48.4% 61.5% 37.2% 65.2% 35.0%
Career — 609/622 8.0 3.8 62.0% 75.6% 51.7% 60.1% 44.5% 66.6% 40.1% — 909/929 9.3 3.0 57.0% 77.1% 52.6% 60.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniil Medvedev Marin Cilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.9 -3.62 -1.03 0.677 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
17 2013 1484 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1498 111.3 -1.65 -2.46 0.850 47.4% -25 +64 — 37.1% -0.77 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.29
18 2014 1487 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1715 126.8 -0.80 -0.10 0.954 49.3% -39 -98 -126 47.5% -0.11 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.13
19 2015 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1908 151.0 +2.06 +1.34 1.082 51.4% -11 -243 -142 57.3% +0.46 10–8 (56%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.68
20 2016 1686 125.7 -0.92 +1.52 1.091 51.8% -58 -63 — 47.8% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.68 2009 1992 159.4 +3.31 +2.77 1.188 52.7% +28 -214 -200 64.9% +1.04 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +2.37
21 2017 1740 146.3 -0.73 +0.04 0.954 49.5% -69 -182 +107 48.6% -0.11 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25 2010 1857 158.2 +2.35 +1.40 1.109 51.8% +72 +14 -102 58.6% +0.73 13–5 (72%) 11–19 (37%) — +1.24
22 2018 2034 157.6 +1.04 +1.47 1.046 50.9% +11 -502 -192 59.6% +0.40 13–8 (62%) 11–9 (55%) — -1.36 2011 1966 162.8 +4.08 +1.86 1.156 52.2% +25 -52 -198 59.6% +0.62 12–7 (63%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.09
23 2019 2127 174.7 +4.17 +5.57 1.295 54.1% +39 -430 -272 70.3% +1.22 9–11 (45%) 23–10 (70%) — -0.18 2012 2005 160.0 +1.42 +3.57 1.123 52.2% -30 +11 -22 62.0% +0.74 8–3 (73%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.95
24 2020 2180 169.6 +6.03 +3.69 1.347 54.2% +45 — — 67.0% +1.30 7–3 (70%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.98 2013 2005 157.1 +3.69 +2.41 1.208 52.9% +18 -88 +81 63.4% +0.90 8–5 (62%) 11–4 (73%) — +0.69
25 2021 2239 172.8 +6.07 +5.71 1.378 55.1% +60 -456 -284 73.4% +1.60 13–5 (72%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.39 2014 2130 169.3 +3.49 +2.72 1.150 52.3% +34 -173 -10 65.8% +0.76 13–9 (59%) 20–9 (69%) — -2.53
26 2022 2061 170.2 +3.94 +4.83 1.253 54.0% +76 -213 -40 70.9% +1.29 3–9 (25%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.62 2015 2064 160.5 +3.04 +1.34 1.114 51.7% +53 -93 +78 60.4% +0.54 12–8 (60%) 26–9 (74%) — +1.96
27 2023 2162 177.0 +4.02 +6.16 1.258 54.0% +62 -194 -88 71.4% +1.44 14–6 (70%) 16–15 (52%) — -3.49 2016 2136 171.9 +5.19 +1.67 1.193 52.6% +11 -180 +58 63.1% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.16
28 2024 2091 167.2 +1.18 +4.88 1.118 52.0% +49 -130 +43 64.1% +0.74 11–4 (73%) 20–8 (71%) — -1.43 2017 2055 166.2 +4.81 +4.38 1.303 53.9% -89 -3 +181 63.1% +0.91 10–12 (45%) 16–14 (53%) — +0.86
29 2025 1951 157.6 +2.07 +4.31 1.216 53.1% +40 -8 +114 60.6% +0.85 14–12 (54%) 14–16 (47%) — +3.07 2018 2054 170.8 +5.78 +3.23 1.264 53.3% -14 +7 +214 64.3% +0.99 9–10 (47%) 20–18 (53%) — -0.29
30 2026 1885 156.4 +0.76 +4.96 1.172 52.8% +120 +15 +122 63.9% +1.01 8–7 (53%) 6–13 (32%) — +1.68 2019 1912 154.6 +1.14 -0.18 1.003 50.4% +27 +85 +277 54.5% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1842 146.2 +1.45 -0.54 1.037 50.2% +6 +126 — 45.5% -0.05 7–4 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1929 146.3 +3.33 +0.85 1.108 51.7% -35 +4 +247 57.9% +0.43 13–8 (62%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1953 160.1 +4.07 +1.98 1.190 52.7% -43 +52 +215 60.6% +0.86 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1933 104.1 +0.22 +0.03 0.907 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.03
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1827 133.0 +0.92 -0.98 0.975 50.1% -8 — — 45.7% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1825 142.2 +1.69 -2.10 0.870 48.1% +3 — +327 43.1% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1748 138.1 +0.72 +0.13 1.005 50.1% +67 0 +278 48.6% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.87
Career — 2280 170.5 +2.86 +4.34 1.200 53.1% +44 -213 -48 65.6% +1.01 104–74 (58%) 132–106 (55%) 101.1 -0.61 — 2200 164.7 +3.06 +1.77 1.127 51.9% +6 -47 +77 59.1% +0.60 170–127 (57%) 230–214 (52%) 99.2 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.