H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Matteo Arnaldi H2H: 4-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Matteo Arnaldi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2024 Shanghai Masters third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 25
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2024* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Matteo Arnaldi | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2024* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Matteo Arnaldi | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2023* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 7-5 | Matteo Arnaldi | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2023* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-2 | Matteo Arnaldi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Matteo Arnaldi | #34 | #29 | 1,485 | 1,906 | 71 | 73 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Matteo Arnaldi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #44 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #37 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #34 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |