H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:33 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Matteo Berrettini H2H: 1-1
Daniil Medvedev and Matteo Berrettini are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2026 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Matteo Berrettini | 6-0 6-0 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Matteo Berrettini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 |