H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Mikhail Kukushkin H2H: 2-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 2–0 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2018 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2016* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Mikhail Kukushkin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |