H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2024 Roland Garros second round 6-1 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-1 5-0 (ret.) | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | May 30, 2024* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-0 6-3 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | Jan 6, 2023* | R16 | Adelaide 1 | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(0) 6-1 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | Aug 6, 2022* | SF | Los Cabos Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | May 28, 2022* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,280 | 435 | 187 | 69.9% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #64 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,942 | 175 | 191 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #2 | 2,239 | 1 | 13 | 2025 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,060 | 1 | 15 | 2026 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,161 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #5 | 2,090 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #8 | 1,890 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 20 | 2016 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2020 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2021 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2018 | 36 | 14 | 50 | 72.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2022 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 45 | 13 | 58 | 77.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2023 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2020 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 42.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 41 | 8 | 49 | 83.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2025 | 19 | 18 | 37 | 51.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2026 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 50 | 12 | 62 | 80.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 29 | 12 | 41 | 70.7% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 327 | 120 | 447 | 73.2% | 51 | 39 | 90 | 56.7% | 57 | 28 | 85 | 67.1% | — | 113 | 120 | 233 | 48.5% | 43 | 48 | 91 | 47.3% | 19 | 23 | 42 | 45.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 610/623 of Daniil Medvedev's and 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 54.9% | 68.6% | 48.8% | 61.8% | 66.7% | 59.6% | 30.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 42/42 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 61.7% | 72.2% | 55.9% | 59.9% | 36.4% | 65.9% | 35.8% |
| 20 | 2016 | 10/10 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 59.9% | 71.2% | 46.0% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.0% | 2020 | 29/29 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 56.8% | 71.1% | 52.0% | 61.8% | 45.0% | 62.8% | 38.1% |
| 21 | 2017 | 45/45 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 60.6% | 71.5% | 49.0% | 59.7% | 42.9% | 62.9% | 35.4% | 2021 | 37/39 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 61.3% | 66.1% | 52.4% | 53.5% | 38.6% | 60.6% | 36.8% |
| 22 | 2018 | 63/64 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 57.6% | 74.4% | 51.1% | 63.9% | 41.2% | 64.7% | 36.9% | 2022 | 61/61 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 62.8% | 69.6% | 54.7% | 58.7% | 42.9% | 64.2% | 38.9% |
| 23 | 2019 | 79/79 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 59.8% | 76.4% | 55.9% | 54.9% | 45.9% | 68.2% | 41.2% | 2023 | 54/54 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 69.7% | 54.3% | 60.4% | 41.5% | 63.7% | 37.1% |
| 24 | 2020 | 33/33 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 61.6% | 79.0% | 55.4% | 66.1% | 44.5% | 70.3% | 40.1% | 2024 | 53/53 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 61.8% | 70.6% | 53.0% | 54.7% | 38.0% | 64.0% | 35.5% |
| 25 | 2021 | 62/66 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 79.2% | 54.1% | 59.7% | 46.6% | 69.7% | 41.8% | 2025 | 46/50 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 61.7% | 73.4% | 49.8% | 56.0% | 42.4% | 64.3% | 36.6% |
| 26 | 2022 | 60/60 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 64.6% | 76.5% | 51.3% | 67.8% | 47.6% | 67.6% | 40.6% | 2026 | 36/36 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 62.1% | 72.7% | 53.9% | 54.4% | 37.9% | 65.4% | 35.5% |
| 27 | 2023 | 84/85 | 7.0 | 4.1 | 64.5% | 76.2% | 50.8% | 62.5% | 46.8% | 67.0% | 41.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 62/65 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 61.2% | 73.1% | 49.9% | 57.7% | 46.1% | 64.3% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 64/66 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 62.3% | 76.2% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 38.3% | 66.6% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 48/50 | 7.8 | 4.1 | 65.3% | 74.0% | 48.3% | 62.2% | 43.0% | 65.2% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 610/623 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 62.0% | 75.6% | 51.7% | 60.2% | 44.4% | 66.6% | 40.1% | — | 360/366 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 61.3% | 70.6% | 53.3% | 57.4% | 40.5% | 63.9% | 36.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1484 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1523 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1487 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1523 | 109.1 | -2.34 | -0.04 | 0.761 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1508 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1738 | 136.0 | +1.11 | +0.25 | 1.049 | 50.7% | -45 | -109 | -70 | 49.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 10–15 (40%) | — | +0.34 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1686 | 125.7 | -0.92 | +1.52 | 1.091 | 51.8% | -58 | -63 | — | 47.8% | +0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.68 | 2020 | 1811 | 152.0 | +0.41 | +0.92 | 1.024 | 50.6% | -34 | -102 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 7–1 (88%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.24 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1740 | 146.3 | -0.73 | +0.04 | 0.954 | 49.5% | -69 | -182 | +107 | 48.6% | -0.11 | 10–6 (63%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.25 | 2021 | 1681 | 139.9 | -2.18 | -0.06 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -2 | +40 | -20 | 43.4% | -0.55 | 4–12 (25%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | -0.07 |
| 22 | 2018 | 2034 | 157.6 | +1.04 | +1.47 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +11 | -502 | -192 | 59.6% | +0.40 | 13–8 (62%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | -1.36 | 2022 | 1880 | 158.3 | +1.28 | +2.51 | 1.087 | 51.3% | +3 | -38 | -181 | 57.9% | +0.44 | 9–7 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.44 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2127 | 174.7 | +4.17 | +5.57 | 1.295 | 54.1% | +39 | -430 | -272 | 70.3% | +1.22 | 9–11 (45%) | 23–10 (70%) | — | -0.18 | 2023 | 1682 | 143.3 | -0.28 | +0.50 | 1.022 | 50.3% | +34 | +72 | -37 | 47.7% | -0.09 | 5–13 (28%) | 15–18 (45%) | — | +1.58 |
| 24 | 2020 | 2180 | 169.6 | +6.03 | +3.69 | 1.347 | 54.2% | +45 | — | — | 67.0% | +1.30 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.98 | 2024 | 1769 | 147.8 | +0.06 | -0.05 | 0.985 | 49.5% | -45 | +47 | -48 | 45.9% | -0.14 | 8–9 (47%) | 8–19 (30%) | — | -1.66 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2239 | 172.8 | +6.07 | +5.71 | 1.378 | 55.1% | +60 | -456 | -284 | 73.4% | +1.60 | 13–5 (72%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | -1.39 | 2025 | 1720 | 142.1 | -0.36 | +0.34 | 1.023 | 50.2% | -3 | +9 | +6 | 48.6% | -0.02 | 9–16 (36%) | 12–15 (44%) | — | -0.94 |
| 26 | 2022 | 2061 | 170.2 | +3.94 | +4.83 | 1.253 | 54.0% | +76 | -213 | -40 | 70.9% | +1.29 | 3–9 (25%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -0.62 | 2026 | 1661 | 138.0 | +0.53 | +0.20 | 1.027 | 50.3% | +26 | +15 | +27 | 46.6% | -0.29 | 7–15 (32%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.13 |
| 27 | 2023 | 2162 | 177.0 | +4.02 | +6.16 | 1.258 | 54.0% | +62 | -194 | -88 | 71.4% | +1.44 | 14–6 (70%) | 16–15 (52%) | — | -3.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 2091 | 167.2 | +1.18 | +4.88 | 1.118 | 52.0% | +49 | -130 | +43 | 64.1% | +0.74 | 11–4 (73%) | 20–8 (71%) | — | -1.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1951 | 157.6 | +2.07 | +4.31 | 1.216 | 53.1% | +40 | -8 | +114 | 60.6% | +0.85 | 14–12 (54%) | 14–16 (47%) | — | +3.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 156.1 | +0.85 | +5.12 | 1.180 | 52.9% | +119 | +9 | +116 | 64.8% | +1.06 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–13 (32%) | — | +1.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2280 | 170.4 | +2.87 | +4.36 | 1.200 | 53.1% | +44 | -214 | -48 | 65.6% | +1.01 | 104–74 (58%) | 132–106 (55%) | 101.1 | -0.57 | — | 1942 | 149.6 | +0.12 | +0.65 | 1.020 | 50.2% | -9 | +8 | -50 | 48.8% | -0.05 | 54–76 (42%) | 82–99 (45%) | 92.2 | -0.94 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 13 | 8 | 21 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 7 | 10 | 17 | May 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 10 | 5 | 15 | Feb 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 5 | 8 | 13 | Sep 10, 2023 | H2H |
| Grigor Dimitrov | 9 | 3 | 12 | Oct 30, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 4 | 3 | 7 | Mar 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Tommy Paul | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Yoshihito Nishioka | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 14, 2025 | H2H |