H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Miomir Kecmanovic H2H: 4-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2024 Roland Garros second round 6-1 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 6-1 5-0 (ret.) | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2023* | Adelaide 1 | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-0 6-3 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2022* | Los Cabos | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(0) 6-1 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| May 28, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |