H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Quentin Halys H2H: 3-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–0 lead over Quentin Halys in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2026 Australian Open second round 6-7(9) 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-7(9) 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2025* | Terra Wortmann Open | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 7-5 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2023* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-2 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Quentin Halys | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |