H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Thanasi Kokkinakis H2H: 3-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–0 lead over Thanasi Kokkinakis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2018 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(8) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(8) 6-4 | Thanasi Kokkinakis | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2017* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-2 | Thanasi Kokkinakis | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2017* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 7-6(3) | Thanasi Kokkinakis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Thanasi Kokkinakis | #460 | #65 | 802 | 1,864 | 73 | 91 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Thanasi Kokkinakis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #209 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #93 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2023 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2025 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #454 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #460 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |