H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Daniil Medvedev holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2017 Chennai round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-3 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data | Jan 5, 2017* | R32 | Chennai | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,280 | 434 | 187 | 69.9% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #280 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 121 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #2 | 2,239 | 1 | 13 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,060 | 1 | 15 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,161 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #89 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #5 | 2,090 | 1 | 20 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #8 | 1,885 | 1 | 23 | 2024 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #109 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2016 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 36 | 14 | 50 | 72.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 45 | 13 | 58 | 77.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2017 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 41 | 8 | 49 | 83.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2019 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 50 | 12 | 62 | 80.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 29 | 12 | 41 | 70.7% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2022 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2025 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2023 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 326 | 120 | 446 | 73.1% | 51 | 39 | 90 | 56.7% | 57 | 28 | 85 | 67.1% | — | 20 | 42 | 62 | 32.3% | 59 | 72 | 131 | 45.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 609/622 of Daniil Medvedev's and 200/202 of Thiago Monteiro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2016 | 10/10 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 59.9% | 71.2% | 46.0% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 45/45 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 60.6% | 71.5% | 49.0% | 59.7% | 42.9% | 62.9% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 63/64 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 57.6% | 74.4% | 51.1% | 63.9% | 41.2% | 64.7% | 36.9% | 2016 | 12/12 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 67.1% | 68.7% | 53.9% | 51.1% | 35.9% | 63.6% | 32.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 79/79 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 59.8% | 76.4% | 55.9% | 54.9% | 45.9% | 68.2% | 41.2% | 2017 | 33/33 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 65.3% | 69.2% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 44.5% | 62.1% | 33.5% |
| 24 | 2020 | 33/33 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 61.6% | 79.0% | 55.4% | 66.1% | 44.5% | 70.3% | 40.1% | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 60.3% | 73.4% | 54.4% | 63.7% | 41.9% | 66.1% | 33.1% |
| 25 | 2021 | 62/66 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 79.2% | 54.1% | 59.7% | 46.6% | 69.7% | 41.8% | 2019 | 13/13 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 64.6% | 69.2% | 47.9% | 46.3% | 35.3% | 61.2% | 35.9% |
| 26 | 2022 | 60/60 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 64.6% | 76.5% | 51.3% | 67.8% | 47.6% | 67.6% | 40.6% | 2020 | 16/16 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 68.1% | 72.8% | 53.1% | 66.9% | 39.2% | 66.7% | 36.5% |
| 27 | 2023 | 84/85 | 7.0 | 4.1 | 64.5% | 76.2% | 50.8% | 62.5% | 46.8% | 67.0% | 41.5% | 2021 | 28/29 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 67.3% | 72.3% | 51.9% | 67.3% | 41.8% | 65.5% | 36.2% |
| 28 | 2024 | 62/65 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 61.2% | 73.1% | 49.9% | 57.7% | 46.1% | 64.3% | 39.9% | 2022 | 32/32 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 66.1% | 73.0% | 54.9% | 62.9% | 44.0% | 66.8% | 32.5% |
| 29 | 2025 | 64/66 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 62.3% | 76.2% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 38.3% | 66.6% | 40.6% | 2023 | 22/22 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 60.7% | 71.7% | 51.6% | 56.8% | 35.0% | 64.1% | 31.5% |
| 30 | 2026 | 47/49 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 65.3% | 73.8% | 48.4% | 61.4% | 43.2% | 65.1% | 40.9% | 2024 | 20/21 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 64.9% | 73.3% | 54.1% | 61.4% | 45.9% | 66.7% | 36.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7/7 | 7.6 | 4.3 | 61.6% | 72.7% | 48.0% | 54.3% | 27.9% | 63.1% | 32.1% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 69.0% | 74.0% | 26.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 59.0% | 24.0% |
| Career | — | 609/622 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 62.0% | 75.6% | 51.7% | 60.1% | 44.5% | 66.6% | 40.1% | — | 200/202 | 5.6 | 2.3 | 64.9% | 71.7% | 51.9% | 59.4% | 40.6% | 64.7% | 33.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1484 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1484 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1487 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 1508 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1470 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1686 | 125.7 | -0.92 | +1.52 | 1.091 | 51.8% | -58 | -63 | — | 47.8% | +0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.68 | 2014 | 1473 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1740 | 146.3 | -0.73 | +0.04 | 0.954 | 49.5% | -69 | -182 | +107 | 48.6% | -0.11 | 10–6 (63%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.25 | 2015 | 1510 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 2034 | 157.6 | +1.04 | +1.47 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +11 | -502 | -192 | 59.6% | +0.40 | 13–8 (62%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | -1.36 | 2016 | 1594 | 131.6 | -0.11 | -1.68 | 0.878 | 48.6% | — | +103 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2127 | 174.7 | +4.17 | +5.57 | 1.295 | 54.1% | +39 | -430 | -272 | 70.3% | +1.22 | 9–11 (45%) | 23–10 (70%) | — | -0.18 | 2017 | 1624 | 133.1 | -1.63 | -2.98 | 0.884 | 48.3% | -101 | +60 | — | 39.6% | -0.76 | 5–11 (31%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +0.52 |
| 24 | 2020 | 2180 | 169.6 | +6.03 | +3.69 | 1.347 | 54.2% | +45 | — | — | 67.0% | +1.30 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.98 | 2018 | 1645 | 127.0 | +1.64 | -2.08 | 0.975 | 50.2% | — | +83 | — | 52.5% | +0.13 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | +0.01 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2239 | 172.8 | +6.07 | +5.71 | 1.378 | 55.1% | +60 | -456 | -284 | 73.4% | +1.60 | 13–5 (72%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | -1.39 | 2019 | 1643 | 121.8 | -1.82 | -0.72 | 0.925 | 48.1% | -93 | +69 | — | 21.9% | -1.25 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.13 |
| 26 | 2022 | 2061 | 170.2 | +3.94 | +4.83 | 1.253 | 54.0% | +76 | -213 | -40 | 70.9% | +1.29 | 3–9 (25%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -0.62 | 2020 | 1687 | 134.0 | +1.32 | -1.36 | 1.096 | 51.2% | -94 | +48 | — | 51.2% | +0.21 | 2–2 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.23 |
| 27 | 2023 | 2162 | 177.0 | +4.02 | +6.16 | 1.258 | 54.0% | +62 | -194 | -88 | 71.4% | +1.44 | 14–6 (70%) | 16–15 (52%) | — | -3.49 | 2021 | 1614 | 130.7 | +1.64 | -1.28 | 1.048 | 50.9% | +12 | +37 | — | 47.9% | -0.03 | 2–5 (29%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +1.35 |
| 28 | 2024 | 2091 | 167.2 | +1.18 | +4.88 | 1.118 | 52.0% | +49 | -130 | +43 | 64.1% | +0.74 | 11–4 (73%) | 20–8 (71%) | — | -1.43 | 2022 | 1680 | 129.8 | +2.13 | -3.39 | 0.978 | 49.8% | -31 | -6 | -48 | 43.8% | -0.19 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | -0.40 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1951 | 157.6 | +2.07 | +4.31 | 1.216 | 53.1% | +40 | -8 | +114 | 60.6% | +0.85 | 14–12 (54%) | 14–16 (47%) | — | +3.07 | 2023 | 1604 | 127.0 | +0.05 | -3.69 | 0.877 | 48.0% | +4 | +31 | — | 38.7% | -0.68 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.59 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1885 | 156.4 | +0.76 | +4.96 | 1.172 | 52.8% | +120 | +15 | +122 | 63.9% | +1.01 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–13 (32%) | — | +1.68 | 2024 | 1657 | 132.8 | +2.23 | -0.04 | 1.083 | 51.4% | -110 | +149 | — | 47.1% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.52 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1562 | 114.0 | -0.35 | -4.19 | 0.872 | 48.0% | — | +103 | — | 44.0% | -0.72 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.78 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1560 | 105.2 | +0.23 | +0.05 | 0.585 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 2280 | 170.5 | +2.86 | +4.34 | 1.200 | 53.1% | +44 | -213 | -48 | 65.6% | +1.01 | 104–74 (58%) | 132–106 (55%) | 101.1 | -0.61 | — | 1780 | 133.3 | +0.63 | -2.19 | 0.962 | 49.5% | -42 | +66 | -48 | 43.5% | -0.34 | 30–51 (37%) | 49–52 (49%) | 96.4 | +0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 13 | 8 | 21 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 7 | 10 | 17 | May 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 10 | 5 | 15 | Feb 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 5 | 8 | 13 | Sep 10, 2023 | H2H |
| Grigor Dimitrov | 9 | 3 | 12 | Oct 30, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Sebastian Baez | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 10, 2024 | H2H |
| Dusan Lajovic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Karen Khachanov | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 29, 2023 | H2H |