H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Yoshihito Nishioka H2H: 1-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 1–0 lead over Yoshihito Nishioka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2022 Acapulco quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-3 | Yoshihito Nishioka | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2018* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | Yoshihito Nishioka | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2018* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q3 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | — | Yoshihito Nishioka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Yoshihito Nishioka | #177 | #24 | 1,351 | 1,931 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Yoshihito Nishioka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #166 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #73 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #56 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2022 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #36 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2023 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2024 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #69 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2025 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #110 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |