H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danilo Marcelino vs Pablo Arraya H2H: 1-1
Danilo Marcelino and Pablo Arraya are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danilo Marcelino leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pablo Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Arraya won the 1992 Maceio third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1992* | Maceio | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 6-4 6-4 | Danilo Marcelino | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1991* | Brasilia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Danilo Marcelino | 7-6(1) 7-5 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danilo Marcelino | #1,268 | #91 | 404 | 1,574 | 29 | 55 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danilo Marcelino | Pablo Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #256 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |