H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Darren Cahill vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-3
Andres Gomez holds a 3–1 lead over Darren Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1990 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1990* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andres Gomez | 7-6 6-3 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1990* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Darren Cahill | 7-5 6-4 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andres Gomez | 4-6 6-3 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1985* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andres Gomez | 6-0 6-2 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Cahill | #538 | #22 | 823 | 1,893 | 131 | 115 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Darren Cahill | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #132 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #27 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1991 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #91 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |