H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Darren Cahill vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-3

Andres Gomez holds a 3–1 lead over Darren Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1990 Cincinnati Open round of 16 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Darren Cahill
AUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #5 7-6 6-3 Darren Cahill #60 Match data Aug 11, 1990* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Darren Cahill #68 7-5 6-4 Andres Gomez #15 Match data Mar 7, 1990* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andres Gomez #18 4-6 6-3 1-6 6-2 6-3 Darren Cahill #47 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Andres Gomez #10 6-0 6-2 Darren Cahill #152 Match data Oct 18, 1985* R16 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Darren Cahill #538 #22 823 1,889 132 116 53.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Darren Cahill Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1984 2–4 33.3% #268 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 11–12 47.8% #132 1,578 0 0 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1986 5–6 45.5% #137 1,549 0 0 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1987 17–18 48.6% #82 1,660 0 0 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1988 32–23 58.2% #27 1,768 0 1 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1989 23–19 54.8% #53 1,756 0 1 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1990 22–19 53.7% #57 1,820 0 1 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1991 15–6 71.4% #91 1,868 0 2 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 — — — — — — — 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1994 5–9 35.7% #192 1,772 0 2 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 — — — — — — — 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 — — — — — — — 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 — — — — — — — 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Darren Cahill Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1984 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1987 8 7 15 53.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1989 12 10 22 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1991 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1994 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 52 117 55.6% 29 23 52 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 17 19 36 47.2% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Darren Cahill Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1984 1503 101.4 — — — — — — +36 33.3% -0.78 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 100.2 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1579 119.7 — — — — -42 +39 -36 44.4% -0.25 6–1 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 +1.37 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20
20 1986 1549 104.9 — — — — -32 +66 -4 43.3% -0.53 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.42 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09
21 1987 1660 131.0 — — — — -40 +62 -197 48.4% -0.23 7–6 (54%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 +1.36 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54
22 1988 1769 143.6 — — — — -66 -3 -129 55.3% +0.54 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 101.9 -1.01 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90
23 1989 1756 135.5 — — — — -3 +10 -122 51.7% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 11–7 (61%) 107.4 +0.31 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48
24 1990 1820 148.2 — — — — -2 — -130 53.3% +0.28 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 95.9 -2.15 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36
25 1991 1869 142.3 +3.05 +1.72 1.173 52.8% +4 — — 62.5% +0.71 7–2 (78%) 4–4 (50%) 106.6 +0.06 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88
28 1994 1772 133.1 -0.61 +1.03 0.946 49.2% +15 — — 41.7% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 95.6 -1.33 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27
Career — 1889 142.3 +1.54 +1.44 1.072 51.3% -20 +30 -89 51.1% +0.11 51–38 (57%) 50–51 (50%) 106.4 +0.18 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.