H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Darren Cahill vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1

Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Darren Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1985 Sydney International round of 64 6-3 7-6.

AUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #133 6-3 7-6 Darren Cahill #119 Match data Dec 11, 1985* R64 Sydney International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Darren Cahill #538 #22 823 1,889 132 116 53.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Darren Cahill Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1984 2–4 33.3% #268 1,502 0 0
19 1985 11–12 47.8% #132 1,578 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1986 5–6 45.5% #137 1,549 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1987 17–18 48.6% #82 1,660 0 0 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1988 32–23 58.2% #27 1,768 0 1 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1989 23–19 54.8% #53 1,756 0 1 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1990 22–19 53.7% #57 1,820 0 1 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1991 15–6 71.4% #91 1,868 0 2 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1994 5–9 35.7% #192 1,772 0 2 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Darren Cahill Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 8 7 15 53.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1989 12 10 22 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 9 5 14 64.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1994 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 65 52 117 55.6% 29 23 52 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Darren Cahill Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1984 1503 101.4 +36 33.3% -0.78 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 100.2 +0.41
19 1985 1579 119.7 -42 +39 -36 44.4% -0.25 6–1 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 +1.37 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01
20 1986 1549 104.9 -32 +66 -4 43.3% -0.53 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.42 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1987 1660 131.0 -40 +62 -197 48.4% -0.23 7–6 (54%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 +1.36 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1988 1769 143.6 -66 -3 -129 55.3% +0.54 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 101.9 -1.01 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1989 1756 135.5 -3 +10 -122 51.7% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 11–7 (61%) 107.4 +0.31 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1990 1820 148.2 -2 -130 53.3% +0.28 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 95.9 -2.15 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1991 1869 142.3 +3.05 +1.72 1.173 52.8% +4 62.5% +0.71 7–2 (78%) 4–4 (50%) 106.6 +0.06 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1994 1772 133.1 -0.61 +1.03 0.946 49.2% +15 41.7% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 95.6 -1.33 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
Career 1889 142.3 +1.54 +1.44 1.072 51.3% -20 +30 -89 51.1% +0.11 51–38 (57%) 50–51 (50%) 106.4 +0.18 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.