H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Darren Cahill vs Franco Davin H2H: 1-0
Darren Cahill holds a 1–0 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Darren Cahill leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Darren Cahill won the 1989 Rome second round 1-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1989* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Darren Cahill | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Cahill | #538 | #22 | 823 | 1,893 | 131 | 115 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Darren Cahill | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #132 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #27 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #91 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |