H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Darren Cahill vs Lawson Duncan H2H: 1-1
Darren Cahill and Lawson Duncan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lawson Duncan leads 1–0 on clay, while Darren Cahill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Darren Cahill won the 1988 US Open first round 6-0 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Darren Cahill | 6-0 6-0 6-2 | Lawson Duncan | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1986* | Bari | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lawson Duncan | 6-3 6-3 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Cahill | #538 | #22 | 823 | 1,893 | 131 | 115 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lawson Duncan | #1,094 | #47 | 317 | 1,761 | 105 | 110 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Darren Cahill | Lawson Duncan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #132 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #165 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #59 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #174 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #27 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #93 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #91 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #91 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |