H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Darren Cahill vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-2
Darren Cahill and Tomas Smid are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Darren Cahill leads 2–1 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Darren Cahill won the 1988 Gstaad fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1988* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Darren Cahill | 6-1 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1987* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Darren Cahill | 6-7 7-6 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-3 7-5 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-1 6-1 | Darren Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Cahill | #538 | #22 | 823 | 1,893 | 131 | 115 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Darren Cahill | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #132 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #27 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #91 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |