H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Darren Cahill vs Ulf Stenlund H2H: 0-1

Ulf Stenlund holds a 1–0 lead over Darren Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ulf Stenlund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ulf Stenlund won the 1986 Roland Garros round of 64 6-3 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Darren Cahill
AUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ulf Stenlund
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ulf Stenlund #101 6-3 6-1 6-0 Darren Cahill #116 Match data May 30, 1986* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Darren Cahill #538 #22 823 1,889 132 116 53.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ulf Stenlund #901 #23 153 1,813 52 44 54.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Darren Cahill Ulf Stenlund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1984 2–4 33.3% #268 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 11–12 47.8% #132 1,578 0 0 1986 20–12 62.5% #34 1,697 0 1
20 1986 5–6 45.5% #137 1,549 0 0 1987 24–19 55.8% #43 1,681 0 1
21 1987 17–18 48.6% #82 1,660 0 0 1988 6–11 35.3% #246 1,616 0 1
22 1988 32–23 58.2% #27 1,768 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1989 23–19 54.8% #53 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1990 22–19 53.7% #57 1,820 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 15–6 71.4% #91 1,868 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #301 1,605 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% #312 1,635 0 1
28 1994 5–9 35.7% #192 1,772 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Darren Cahill Ulf Stenlund
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1984 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 8 7 15 53.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1989 12 10 22 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 52 117 55.6% 29 23 52 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 17 19 36 47.2% — 7 8 15 46.7% 41 29 70 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/35 of Darren Cahill's and 4/4 of Ulf Stenlund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Darren Cahill Ulf Stenlund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 20/21 4.1 2.9 59.5% 73.6% 52.5% 55.6% 42.2% 65.0% 41.0% 1992 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.7% 59.1% 45.8% 16.7% 60.0% 54.4% 37.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 3/3 0.3 1.0 85.9% 57.9% 46.1% 66.7% 81.7% 56.7% 44.1%
28 1994 14/14 3.3 3.1 59.2% 68.9% 47.3% 52.8% 43.8% 60.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/248 3.8 3.0 59.4% 71.7% 50.4% 54.4% 42.9% 63.0% 39.6% — 4/96 0.5 1.3 80.6% 58.2% 46.0% 54.2% 76.3% 56.1% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Darren Cahill Ulf Stenlund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1984 1503 101.4 — — — — — — +36 33.3% -0.78 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1579 119.7 — — — — -42 +39 -36 44.4% -0.25 6–1 (86%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.37 1986 1698 135.3 — — — — -187 +80 — 60.0% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.34
20 1986 1549 104.9 — — — — -32 +66 -4 43.3% -0.53 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.42 1987 1682 138.6 — — — — -54 +27 — 53.4% +0.38 10–9 (53%) 7–10 (41%) — +0.31
21 1987 1660 131.0 — — — — -40 +62 -197 48.4% -0.23 7–6 (54%) 7–7 (50%) — +1.36 1988 1617 127.1 — — — — — +50 — 40.9% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.15
22 1988 1769 143.6 — — — — -66 -3 -129 55.3% +0.54 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1989 1756 135.5 — — — — -3 +10 -122 51.7% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 1820 148.2 — — — — -2 — -130 53.3% +0.28 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1869 142.3 +3.05 +1.72 1.173 52.8% +4 — — 62.5% +0.71 7–2 (78%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.06 1992 1606 104.7 +0.66 -3.36 0.818 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1636 115.1 -1.60 +2.39 1.018 50.8% — +65 — 66.7% +1.50 — — — +0.18
28 1994 1772 133.1 -0.61 +1.03 0.946 49.2% +15 — — 41.7% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 142.3 +1.54 +1.44 1.072 51.3% -20 +30 -89 51.1% +0.11 51–38 (57%) 50–51 (50%) 106.4 +0.18 — 1813 138.5 -1.04 +0.95 0.966 49.6% -87 +53 — 53.3% +0.24 18–18 (50%) 11–14 (44%) 101.1 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.