David Engel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 27, 1993 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 9, 1992 | H2H |
| Lars Jonsson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 5, 1992 | H2H |
| Stephane Simian | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 8, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicklas Kulti | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 14, 1993 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
David Engel vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 0-1
Joakim Nystrom holds a 1–0 lead over David Engel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1989 Swedish Open round of 16 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joakim Nystrom | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | David Engel | Match data | Aug 4, 1989* | R16 | Swedish Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Engel | #854 | #114 | 312 | 1,597 | 24 | 48 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,121 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Engel | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #274 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1990 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #117 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,943 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1991 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,926 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #211 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,730 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Engel | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 1990 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1986 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% |
| 24 | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 20 | 29 | 31.0% | 8 | 18 | 26 | 30.8% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | 60 | 31 | 91 | 65.9% | 138 | 70 | 208 | 66.3% | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Engel | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1483 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | 1980 | 1492 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1645 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +23 | -103 | 46.8% | -0.24 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.49 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1461 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1982 | 1618 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +115 | — | 43.5% | -0.32 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 1988 | 1437 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.24 | 1983 | 1868 | 149.9 | — | — | — | — | -235 | -70 | -111 | 63.6% | +0.95 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | 1989 | 1423 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | 23.1% | -1.46 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 | 1984 | 1969 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -15 | -234 | 65.1% | +0.98 | 19–4 (83%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -0.15 |
| 22 | 1990 | 1520 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -13 | +96 | 45.3% | -0.21 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.97 | 1985 | 1943 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +26 | -150 | 65.8% | +1.19 | 12–9 (57%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +0.33 |
| 23 | 1991 | 1551 | 129.5 | -0.99 | +0.60 | 0.939 | 48.8% | -30 | -10 | — | 39.6% | -0.42 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.06 | 1986 | 1926 | 163.8 | — | — | — | — | +108 | +4 | -113 | 70.2% | +1.58 | 13–7 (65%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | -0.15 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1573 | 122.2 | -0.98 | -0.95 | 0.884 | 48.1% | -22 | -34 | — | 37.5% | -0.46 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.13 | 1987 | 1880 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +138 | -78 | 62.8% | +0.97 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -0.40 |
| 25 | 1993 | 1581 | 115.0 | -0.51 | -0.41 | 0.815 | 47.1% | -28 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | — | — | — | -0.31 | 1988 | 1730 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +142 | +66 | 47.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -1.25 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1555 | 104.1 | -1.33 | -0.10 | 0.986 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.20 | 1989 | 1608 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +152 | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.53 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1539 | 101.2 | -0.98 | -6.88 | 0.988 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1598 | 125.3 | -0.97 | -0.26 | 0.916 | 48.5% | -22 | -6 | +96 | 37.5% | -0.56 | 8–16 (33%) | 9–13 (41%) | 95.7 | +2.00 | — | 2121 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +44 | -117 | 60.9% | +0.82 | 76–41 (65%) | 57–41 (58%) | 108.6 | -0.43 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Joakim Nystrom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 6, 1986 | H2H |