H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Alberto Martin H2H: 5-3

David Ferrer holds a 5–3 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–2 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2009 US Open first round 7-5 5-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Alberto Martin
ESP Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Ferrer #19 7-5 5-7 6-3 6-3 Alberto Martin #93 Match data
Oct 13, 2005* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Alberto Martin #58 2-6 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #16 Match data
May 8, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay David Ferrer #25 6-2 3-6 7-5 Alberto Martin #62 Match data
Apr 9, 2005* Valencia ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #32 6-1 6-4 Alberto Martin #56 Match data
Feb 10, 2005* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Alberto Martin #69 5-0 (ret.) David Ferrer #47 Match data
Sep 30, 2004* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay David Ferrer #51 2-6 6-1 6-4 Alberto Martin #68 Match data
Sep 25, 2003* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Alberto Martin #61 7-6(4) 6-2 David Ferrer #82 Match data
Jan 9, 2003* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #58 6-3 6-2 Alberto Martin #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,799 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Alberto Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,489 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,721 0 2
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,606 0 2
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,673 0 3
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,656 0 3
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,622 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,658 0 3
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,622 0 3
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,593 0 3
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —