H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Ferrer vs Andy Roddick H2H: 5-4

David Ferrer holds a 5–4 lead over Andy Roddick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2012 Wimbledon third round 2-6 7-6(8) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main draw meetings
Andy Roddick
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Ferrer #5 2-6 7-6(8) 6-4 6-3 Andy Roddick #25 Match data Jul 1, 2012* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Ferrer #5 6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(2) Andy Roddick #15 Match data Oct 15, 2011* QF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Andy Roddick #21 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 David Ferrer #5 Match data Sep 6, 2011* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andy Roddick #7 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 David Ferrer #12 Match data Mar 19, 2009* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #5 6-1 6-3 Andy Roddick #6 Match data Nov 19, 2007* SF ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
David Ferrer #15 7-6(4) 6-4 Andy Roddick #4 Match data Aug 17, 2007* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andy Roddick #3 7-5 6-3 David Ferrer #14 Match data Mar 27, 2007* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #11 6-3 4-6 6-4 Andy Roddick #4 Match data Mar 26, 2006* QF Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andy Roddick #3 2-6 6-3 7-6(8) David Ferrer #17 Match data Nov 6, 2005* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,175 580 198 74.6% 1 5 0 5 21 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,854 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,922 0 5
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,091 1 11
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1 2004 68–16 81.0% #2 2,068 1 15
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,036 1 20
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 2,008 1 21
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,007 1 26
26 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,045 1 27
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,990 1 29
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,025 1 30
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11 2012 23–13 63.9% #39 1,990 1 32
30 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18 — — — — — — —
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20 — — — — — — —
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Ferrer Andy Roddick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 20 10 30 66.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 32 11 43 74.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 44 10 54 81.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 51 11 62 82.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 29 9 38 76.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2007 36 11 47 76.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 38 12 50 76.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2009 33 11 44 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 42 15 57 73.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 27 11 38 71.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
30 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — 407 137 544 74.8% 67 29 96 69.8% 83 22 105 79.0% 23 10 33 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's and 752/778 of Andy Roddick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Ferrer Andy Roddick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 7/9 7.4 2.1 56.8% 76.4% 57.4% 61.0% 37.5% 68.5% 33.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 50/55 10.4 3.6 58.9% 80.0% 57.0% 66.5% 37.5% 70.3% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 62/70 9.0 2.6 61.4% 79.8% 54.3% 64.2% 43.5% 70.0% 37.3%
20 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0% 2003 87/89 11.1 2.1 61.8% 80.6% 58.7% 63.1% 44.2% 72.2% 37.3%
21 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3% 2004 81/84 12.6 2.3 63.6% 81.2% 56.9% 69.8% 42.3% 72.3% 38.0%
22 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5% 2005 69/70 13.2 1.9 65.7% 82.6% 58.1% 70.6% 44.9% 74.1% 36.7%
23 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3% 2006 62/63 11.4 1.5 66.8% 79.9% 56.0% 70.1% 46.0% 71.9% 38.3%
24 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3% 2007 64/64 11.7 1.5 64.3% 80.8% 57.2% 65.2% 42.0% 72.4% 34.1%
25 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3% 2008 62/63 14.3 2.1 67.2% 78.4% 56.0% 65.8% 39.5% 71.1% 36.0%
26 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9% 2009 61/62 12.5 1.4 69.8% 79.4% 58.6% 61.6% 40.3% 73.0% 36.4%
27 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7% 2010 66/66 12.3 1.5 68.7% 79.6% 59.2% 67.2% 37.4% 73.0% 35.2%
28 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1% 2011 47/47 12.1 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 56.5% 62.5% 44.0% 69.7% 36.3%
29 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8% 2012 34/36 10.1 1.9 66.4% 75.8% 56.1% 64.8% 37.1% 69.2% 35.1%
30 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3% — 752/778 11.8 2.0 64.8% 79.8% 57.2% 66.1% 41.8% 71.8% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Ferrer Andy Roddick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1562 130.0 +2.92 -1.89 1.051 50.8% +7 — — 42.9% -0.29 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1854 151.7 +6.98 -0.04 1.246 53.2% -50 -84 -182 70.6% +1.13 7–8 (47%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1922 150.3 +6.65 +0.05 1.243 53.3% -11 -76 -241 67.9% +1.02 11–3 (79%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.39
20 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% — +85 — 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.80 2003 2091 158.5 +9.31 +1.00 1.343 54.4% -9 -246 -131 73.2% +1.35 17–5 (77%) 35–20 (64%) — -0.15
21 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 — 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -2.35 2004 2068 162.3 +8.68 +2.20 1.370 54.4% +33 -249 +34 76.8% +1.43 11–6 (65%) 35–10 (78%) — -0.37
22 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.43 2005 2037 158.9 +9.75 +0.54 1.415 54.5% +35 -205 +243 73.3% +1.41 15–6 (71%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.17
23 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 — 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.45 2006 2009 154.0 +8.35 +1.30 1.362 54.5% +43 -198 +195 70.4% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 16–17 (48%) — +3.03
24 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.00 2007 2010 157.9 +8.22 -1.05 1.237 53.0% +51 -248 +218 70.9% +1.07 7–2 (78%) 29–12 (71%) — +1.00
25 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 — 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.11 2008 2007 161.4 +7.15 +0.61 1.248 53.2% +42 -189 +148 69.0% +1.19 14–7 (67%) 23–17 (58%) — +0.50
26 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) — +2.27 2009 2045 166.9 +8.85 +1.67 1.350 54.2% +9 -178 +250 72.2% +1.21 8–7 (53%) 32–11 (74%) — -0.24
27 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.88 2010 1991 164.1 +8.60 +0.23 1.305 53.4% +45 -129 +236 67.5% +0.97 11–7 (61%) 23–17 (58%) — +2.84
28 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) — +0.59 2011 2025 162.2 +5.97 +0.87 1.200 52.6% +41 — +182 63.9% +0.83 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.24
29 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.39 2012 1991 148.1 +4.71 -0.49 1.139 52.1% +25 — +178 60.7% +0.44 7–3 (70%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.02
30 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 — 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) — +2.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 — 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) — +3.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 — 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46 — 2176 164.1 +7.98 +0.64 1.296 53.7% +22 -172 +108 70.1% +1.15 127–64 (66%) 280–166 (63%) 109.2 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.