H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Carlos Moya H2H: 2-6

Carlos Moya holds a 6–2 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 5–0 on clay, while David Ferrer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2007 Umag quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2007* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Carlos Moya #20 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #16 Match data
Mar 13, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Ferrer #15 1-6 6-2 6-3 Carlos Moya #36 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #16 6-3 6-1 Carlos Moya #42 Match data
Jul 30, 2005* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Carlos Moya #29 6-4 0-6 6-3 David Ferrer #21 Match data
Mar 10, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Carlos Moya #7 6-3 6-4 David Ferrer #47 Match data
Jul 26, 2003* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Carlos Moya #4 6-1 6-2 David Ferrer #75 Match data
Feb 20, 2003* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Carlos Moya #4 6-3 6-3 David Ferrer #49 Match data
Jul 21, 2002* Umag ATP 250 F Clay Carlos Moya #18 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —