H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Dominik Hrbaty H2H: 5-3

David Ferrer holds a 5–3 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Dominik Hrbaty leads 3–2 on hard courts, while David Ferrer leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2 6-1.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard David Ferrer #12 6-2 6-2 6-1 Dominik Hrbaty #251 Match data
Apr 20, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #15 6-4 3-6 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #23 Match data
Sep 4, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Dominik Hrbaty #17 6-7(7) 7-5 7-5 7-5 David Ferrer #15 Match data
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Ferrer #28 6-4 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #22 Match data
Mar 27, 2005* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard David Ferrer #44 6-2 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #28 Match data
May 13, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #57 6-0 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #35 Match data
Oct 23, 2003* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Dominik Hrbaty #60 7-5 6-2 David Ferrer #69 Match data
Jan 11, 2003* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Dominik Hrbaty #51 7-5 6-3 David Ferrer #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,948 326 296 52.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Dominik Hrbaty
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,689 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2000 38–27 58.5% #17 1,843 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,678 0 3
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,670 0 3
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,670 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2004 40–24 62.5% #14 1,742 0 6
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,594 0 6
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2008 3–7 30.0% #253 1,563 0 6
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,649 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,589 0 6
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27