H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 4-0

David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2014 Rome Masters fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #5 6-2 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #17 Match data
May 10, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay David Ferrer #5 7-6(3) 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #20 Match data
Oct 19, 2013* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard David Ferrer #3 3-6 6-4 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #26 Match data
Aug 7, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #16 6-2 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #97 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —