H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

David Ferrer vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 11-8

David Ferrer holds an 11–8 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 19 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 7–4 on hard courts, while David Ferrer leads 7–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2017 Roland Garros second round 7-5 3-6 7-5 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
11 – 8
19 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Feliciano Lopez #36 7-5 3-6 7-5 4-6 6-4 David Ferrer #33 Match data Jun 1, 2017* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Ferrer #30 4-6 6-3 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #35 Match data May 16, 2017* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Feliciano Lopez #28 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) David Ferrer #15 Match data Oct 11, 2016* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #11 6-4 7-6(6) 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #23 Match data May 28, 2016* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Ferrer #8 7-5 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #17 Match data Oct 4, 2015* F Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard
David Ferrer #4 7-6(1) 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #37 Match data Feb 27, 2014* R16 Mexican Open ATP 500 Hard
David Ferrer #5 6-1 7-5 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #43 Match data Jun 2, 2013* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Ferrer #6 6-7(4) 7-6(7) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #16 Match data Apr 28, 2012* QF Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
David Ferrer #5 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #28 Match data Oct 15, 2011* SF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #6 6-2 6-0 Feliciano Lopez #43 Match data Apr 13, 2011* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Feliciano Lopez #41 4-6 7-5 6-1 David Ferrer #19 Match data Oct 14, 2009* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #12 6-2 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data Apr 14, 2009* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Feliciano Lopez #40 6-4 7-6(4) David Ferrer #5 Match data Oct 15, 2008* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #41 6-4 6-3 David Ferrer #4 Match data Mar 8, 2008* QF Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #42 7-6(3) 7-5 David Ferrer #7 Match data Oct 18, 2007* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #8 6-4 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #46 Match data Oct 6, 2007* QF Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #81 3-6 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #15 Match data Oct 13, 2006* R16 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
David Ferrer #20 6-4 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #45 Match data May 17, 2006* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Feliciano Lopez #27 4-6 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #18 Match data Aug 27, 2005* SF New Haven ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1
26 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4
34 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Ferrer Feliciano Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
32 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
33 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
34 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
36 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
37 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's and 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Ferrer Feliciano Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1%
20 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0% 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5%
21 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3% 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3%
22 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5% 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3%
23 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3% 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9%
24 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3% 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3% 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9%
26 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9% 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1%
27 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7% 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2%
28 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1% 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3%
29 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8% 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7%
30 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7% 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4%
31 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6% 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8%
32 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3% 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4%
33 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6% 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1%
34 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3% 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4%
35 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6% 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8%
36 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5% 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2%
37 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7% 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1%
Career — 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3% — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Ferrer Feliciano Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17
20 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% — +85 — 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.80 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51
21 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 — 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.3 -2.35 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29
22 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) 104.8 +0.43 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64
23 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 — 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) 100.6 +1.45 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87
24 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 104.0 +1.00 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61
25 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 — 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) 106.0 -0.11 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68
26 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 102.1 +2.27 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42
27 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) 93.6 +0.88 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15
28 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) 100.5 +0.59 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29
29 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) 98.2 +1.39 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54
30 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) 111.7 +1.07 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11
31 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) 102.8 +1.12 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06
32 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 — 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) 99.3 +2.77 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25
33 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 — 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) 105.8 +3.35 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95
34 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 92.4 +1.83 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68
35 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.9 +0.54 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42
36 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) 89.7 -0.57 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44
37 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 — 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.85 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06
Career — 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46 — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.