H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 15-7

David Ferrer holds a 15–7 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 8–6 on clay and 7–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2017 Bastad semifinal 6-1 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
15 – 7
22 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2017* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay David Ferrer #46 6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data
May 8, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #8 5-7 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #38 Match data
Jan 8, 2015* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #10 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #33 Match data
Oct 31, 2014* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Ferrer #6 6-1 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #33 Match data
Oct 24, 2014* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #35 Match data
Oct 19, 2013* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #3 (w/o) Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data
May 15, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #4 5-7 7-5 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #53 Match data
May 16, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #6 6-3 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #16 Match data
Mar 3, 2012* Acapulco ATP 500 F Clay David Ferrer #6 6-1 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #27 Match data
Jan 14, 2012* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #24 Match data
Nov 3, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #24 Match data
Sep 7, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #8 5-7 6-7(8) 6-3 6-3 7-6(4) David Ferrer #12 Match data
May 1, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay David Ferrer #17 7-5 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Apr 24, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 SF Clay Fernando Verdasco #9 6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 David Ferrer #17 Match data
Apr 17, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #8 6-2 6-1 David Ferrer #12 Match data
May 16, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #28 7-6(4) 6-2 David Ferrer #5 Match data
Apr 19, 2008* Valencia ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #5 6-3 1-6 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data
Jul 20, 2007* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #48 7-5 6-3 David Ferrer #15 Match data
Jun 3, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #51 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 6-3 David Ferrer #14 Match data
Apr 20, 2005* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay David Ferrer #20 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #59 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Valencia ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #73 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #67 Match data
Jan 8, 2004* Chennai ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #71 1-6 7-5 6-0 Fernando Verdasco #109 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7