H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Ferrer vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 2-0
David Ferrer holds a 2–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2005 Umag fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2005* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-3 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2003* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |