H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 3-4

Gaston Gaudio holds a 4–3 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 4–2 on clay, while David Ferrer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2007 Auckland third round 5-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Gaston Gaudio
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2007* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #16 5-7 6-3 6-2 Gaston Gaudio #34 Match data
Jun 1, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay David Ferrer #21 2-6 6-4 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 Gaston Gaudio #6 Match data
May 7, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #25 6-0 6-1 Gaston Gaudio #5 Match data
Apr 22, 2005* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Gaston Gaudio #8 6-3 6-4 David Ferrer #20 Match data
Feb 5, 2005* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 SF Clay Gaston Gaudio #8 6-3 4-6 6-2 David Ferrer #53 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Stuttgart ATP 250 SF Clay Gaston Gaudio #11 6-3 5-7 6-4 David Ferrer #47 Match data
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Gaston Gaudio #20 7-5 6-2 David Ferrer #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Gaston Gaudio #1,025 #5 2,440 1,998 253 188 57.4% 1 0 0 0 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Gaston Gaudio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1999 8–15 34.8% #72 1,531 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2000 27–24 52.9% #34 1,663 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2001 23–23 50.0% #48 1,693 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2002 39–17 69.6% #21 1,828 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2003 34–23 59.6% #34 1,764 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2004 35–24 59.3% #10 1,805 1 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2005 54–20 73.0% #10 1,871 1 8
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2006 26–20 56.5% #34 1,697 1 8
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2007 6–15 28.6% #182 1,625 1 8
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2008 0–1 0.0% #969 1,605 1 8
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2009 1–5 16.7% #167 1,524 1 8
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2010 0–1 0.0% #326 1,467 1 8
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —