H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-1

David Ferrer and Gilles Muller are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on grass, while David Ferrer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2016 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 2016* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Gilles Muller #44 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) David Ferrer #14 Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Ferrer #74 7-6(4) 6-1 6-3 Gilles Muller #175 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —