H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
David Ferrer vs Gustavo Kuerten H2H: 1-1
David Ferrer and Gustavo Kuerten are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2004 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-3 7-5 | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2003* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gustavo Kuerten | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | David Ferrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Gustavo Kuerten | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |