H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1

David Ferrer holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 1–0 on clay, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Hicham Arazi #39 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 7-6(7) David Ferrer #49 Match data
Oct 3, 2003* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #82 6-4 5-7 6-0 Hicham Arazi #64 Match data
Jul 24, 2003* Umag ATP 250 R32 Clay David Ferrer #75 6-0 3-1 (ret.) Hicham Arazi #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —