H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Igor Andreev H2H: 5-4

David Ferrer holds a 5–4 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Igor Andreev leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2011 US Open first round 2-6 6-3 6-0 6-4.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Ferrer #5 2-6 6-3 6-0 6-4 Igor Andreev #78 Match data
Feb 20, 2010* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #19 7-5 6-2 Igor Andreev #38 Match data
Feb 28, 2009* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard David Ferrer #14 7-5 6-1 Igor Andreev #24 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass David Ferrer #5 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 Igor Andreev #37 Match data
Aug 23, 2007* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #39 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 David Ferrer #15 Match data
May 9, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Igor Andreev #177 6-4 6-1 David Ferrer #15 Match data
Aug 27, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #18 6-3 6-4 Igor Andreev #57 Match data
Apr 10, 2005* Valencia ATP 250 F Clay Igor Andreev #47 6-3 5-7 6-3 David Ferrer #32 Match data
Jan 9, 2004* Chennai ATP 250 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #88 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27