H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 5-0

David Ferrer holds a 5–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Acapulco third round 6-3 7-6(4).

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 38 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2015* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #9 6-3 7-6(4) Igor Sijsling #132 Match data
May 28, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-3 6-1 Igor Sijsling #55 Match data
Sep 29, 2012* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-3 6-4 Igor Sijsling #97 Match data
Aug 30, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-2 6-3 7-6(12) Igor Sijsling #78 Match data
Jun 22, 2012* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass David Ferrer #6 6-0 6-1 Igor Sijsling #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Igor Sijsling #854 #52 910 1,794 44 84 34.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Igor Sijsling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #302 1,491 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #525 1,464 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2010 3–3 50.0% #126 1,580 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2011 2–3 40.0% #200 1,611 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2012 8–10 44.4% #68 1,758 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2013 15–24 38.5% #70 1,729 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2014 9–25 26.5% #84 1,632 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2015 3–10 23.1% #145 1,692 0 0
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2016 4–7 36.4% #177 1,678 0 0
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27