H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 4-1

David Ferrer holds a 4–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Doha semifinal 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2015* Doha ATP 250 SF Hard David Ferrer #10 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(4) Ivo Karlovic #27 Match data
Oct 18, 2014* Vienna ATP 500 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 7-6(5) 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #30 Match data
Mar 13, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #239 7-6(3) 6-3 David Ferrer #6 Match data
Mar 29, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #17 7-6(5) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #29 Match data
Oct 6, 2007* Tokyo ATP 500 SF Hard David Ferrer #8 7-6(3) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8