H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Ferrer vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 6-1

David Ferrer holds a 6–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2017 Cincinnati Open second round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Ferrer #31 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #69 Match data Aug 16, 2017* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Ferrer #4 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) Janko Tipsarevic #21 Match data Sep 3, 2013* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-3 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data Nov 5, 2012 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-7(5) 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data Sep 6, 2012* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Janko Tipsarevic #46 7-6(8) 6-2 David Ferrer #4 Match data Aug 12, 2008* R64 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard
David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-0 Janko Tipsarevic #37 Match data Apr 25, 2008* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
David Ferrer #15 6-1 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #100 Match data Mar 11, 2007* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,069 248 243 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,553 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,544 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2 2008 25–22 53.2% #49 1,733 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,822 0 0
26 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,809 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,008 0 2
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9 2012 50–27 64.9% #9 1,970 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11 2013 19–23 45.2% #36 1,768 0 4
30 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18 — — — — — — —
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,687 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,747 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,664 0 4
34 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Ferrer Janko Tipsarevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2008 16 15 31 51.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2010 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 38 17 55 69.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 29 18 47 61.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — 159 142 301 52.8% 49 61 110 44.5% 38 34 72 52.8% 2 6 8 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's and 484/491 of Janko Tipsarevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Ferrer Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/3 6.0 1.7 54.3% 69.5% 55.6% 43.6% 40.6% 62.7% 34.5%
20 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0% 2004 9/9 7.7 3.3 58.4% 71.0% 46.0% 53.8% 30.4% 60.8% 36.4%
21 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3% 2005 22/22 5.7 3.1 51.9% 70.6% 51.3% 48.7% 34.1% 61.3% 34.8%
22 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5% 2006 25/25 7.1 2.2 57.1% 75.0% 49.3% 50.8% 34.2% 64.0% 34.1%
23 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3% 2007 38/38 8.0 2.7 55.2% 74.6% 47.1% 56.6% 43.5% 61.6% 32.1%
24 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3% 2008 44/47 9.3 2.6 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 52.5% 43.7% 64.8% 34.4%
25 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3% 2009 49/49 6.4 2.5 55.7% 73.8% 51.7% 57.1% 44.2% 63.9% 36.6%
26 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9% 2010 44/44 7.0 2.0 57.3% 72.7% 54.1% 60.0% 41.3% 64.7% 36.3%
27 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7% 2011 72/73 6.1 2.3 56.0% 76.7% 56.2% 61.0% 49.2% 67.6% 40.8%
28 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1% 2012 74/77 7.8 2.5 56.9% 75.3% 53.7% 60.1% 42.7% 66.0% 37.6%
29 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8% 2013 42/42 6.2 2.2 57.9% 71.8% 51.9% 64.7% 38.7% 63.3% 34.9%
30 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6% 2015 10/10 6.7 3.4 53.8% 71.1% 48.1% 54.1% 30.7% 60.5% 34.7%
32 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3% 2016 17/17 5.5 3.4 55.1% 74.4% 49.6% 60.7% 42.0% 63.5% 33.5%
33 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6% 2017 17/17 6.1 3.1 54.1% 70.6% 46.5% 48.8% 38.7% 59.6% 33.8%
34 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6% 2019 18/18 5.3 2.8 58.7% 69.7% 48.4% 58.0% 39.6% 60.8% 38.7%
36 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3% — 484/491 6.9 2.5 56.2% 73.9% 51.9% 57.6% 41.9% 64.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Ferrer Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1565 113.0 -0.22 +0.55 0.924 48.2% +9 — — 28.6% -1.28 — 1–1 — -0.28
20 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% — +85 — 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.80 2004 1554 115.3 -1.04 -1.30 0.929 48.4% -23 — — 30.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.51
21 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 — 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -2.35 2005 1545 121.5 -1.24 -1.36 0.900 48.0% -6 +49 +94 35.0% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.44
22 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.43 2006 1557 119.7 +1.24 -1.88 0.947 48.5% +8 -55 +107 38.2% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.13
23 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 — 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.45 2007 1735 133.6 -0.76 -2.94 0.836 46.9% -60 -192 +8 46.9% -0.29 8–5 (62%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63
24 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.00 2008 1734 143.1 +1.16 -1.11 0.978 49.7% -22 -145 +100 55.6% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 17–14 (55%) — +1.14
25 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 — 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.11 2009 1822 147.5 +0.76 +0.05 1.011 50.4% -6 -158 +1 54.8% +0.23 4–9 (31%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.85
26 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) — +2.27 2010 1809 151.3 +1.01 +0.14 1.028 50.6% +32 — -18 53.3% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.29
27 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.88 2011 2008 161.8 +4.65 +3.68 1.259 53.8% +27 -302 -174 67.9% +1.30 9–9 (50%) 17–15 (53%) — +2.83
28 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) — +0.59 2012 1971 166.2 +3.35 +1.51 1.105 51.6% -5 +2 -70 63.4% +0.64 13–10 (57%) 22–12 (65%) — +3.81
29 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.39 2013 1768 146.7 +0.25 -1.48 0.952 49.4% +60 +92 — 45.7% -0.06 8–4 (67%) 5–13 (28%) — +2.99
30 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) — +1.12 2015 1688 112.4 -1.37 -1.80 0.879 47.3% — +95 — 33.3% -1.15 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.32
32 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 — 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) — +2.77 2016 1748 142.6 -0.09 -0.68 0.919 48.7% +53 — +20 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57
33 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 — 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) — +3.35 2017 1664 126.4 -2.04 -2.13 0.837 47.1% +89 +27 +28 35.9% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.12
34 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.54 2019 1665 130.0 -2.14 +0.50 0.985 50.2% +38 +16 +26 45.8% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.05
36 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 — 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46 — 2069 152.5 +1.24 +0.04 1.011 50.2% +11 -51 -1 52.0% +0.13 70–71 (50%) 118–120 (50%) 101.9 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.