H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 6-0

David Ferrer holds a 6–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2017 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #31 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #69 Match data
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard David Ferrer #4 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) Janko Tipsarevic #21 Match data
Nov 5, 2012 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-3 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data
Sep 6, 2012* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-7(5) 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data
Apr 25, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-0 Janko Tipsarevic #37 Match data
Mar 11, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #15 6-1 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 — — — — — — —
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —