H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 2-1

David Ferrer holds a 2–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Ferrer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Ferrer #7 6-3 6-3 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #50 Match data
Feb 10, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #43 6-3 6-4 David Ferrer #6 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Ferrer #7 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —