H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 2-1

David Ferrer holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while David Ferrer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2007 Hamburg Masters second round 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Ferrer #14 6-4 3-6 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #40 Match data
Oct 9, 2004* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet David Ferrer #46 6-2 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #49 Match data
Jul 11, 2003* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Jonas Bjorkman #47 6-2 6-1 David Ferrer #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —