H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 3-5

Jose Acasuso holds a 5–3 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Jose Acasuso leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2009 US Open second round 6-3 3-6 1-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jose Acasuso #47 6-3 3-6 1-6 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #19 Match data
Jul 27, 2007* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay David Ferrer #16 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 Jose Acasuso #70 Match data
Jul 23, 2006* Stuttgart ATP 250 F Clay David Ferrer #18 6-4 3-6 6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 Jose Acasuso #32 Match data
May 10, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jose Acasuso #34 7-5 6-0 David Ferrer #19 Match data
Aug 13, 2004* Sopot ATP 250 R16 Clay Jose Acasuso #105 6-4 7-6(4) David Ferrer #53 Match data
Feb 21, 2004* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Jose Acasuso #111 7-5 7-6(5) David Ferrer #70 Match data
Mar 18, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jose Acasuso #46 6-3 6-4 David Ferrer #51 Match data
Sep 15, 2002* Bucharest ATP 250 F Clay David Ferrer #81 6-3 6-2 Jose Acasuso #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,537 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,667 0 1
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,613 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,678 0 2
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,724 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,709 0 3
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,685 0 3
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,731 0 3
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,666 0 3
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,656 0 3
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 — — — — — — —
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 — — — — — — —
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —