H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 6-0

David Ferrer holds a 6–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 6–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2016 Auckland quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2016* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #8 6-3 6-4 Lukas Rosol #54 Match data
Oct 9, 2015* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard David Ferrer #7 7-6(5) 6-2 Lukas Rosol #79 Match data
Mar 30, 2015* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #7 6-4 7-5 Lukas Rosol #30 Match data
Oct 31, 2013* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #3 6-0 2-6 6-3 Lukas Rosol #44 Match data
Oct 10, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #4 6-3 6-4 Lukas Rosol #45 Match data
Jan 12, 2012* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-2 Lukas Rosol #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —