H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Mardy Fish H2H: 3-4

Mardy Fish holds a 4–3 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2011 Miami Masters quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 1, 2011* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Mardy Fish #15 7-5 6-2 David Ferrer #6 Match data
Oct 31, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #6 6-1 7-6(4) Mardy Fish #40 Match data
Jan 23, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mardy Fish #42 6-1 7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 David Ferrer #14 Match data
Jan 13, 2007* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard David Ferrer #16 6-0 4-6 6-1 Mardy Fish #45 Match data
Aug 24, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #13 6-2 2-6 7-6(5) Mardy Fish #60 Match data
Nov 3, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Mardy Fish #37 6-3 3-6 6-2 David Ferrer #45 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mardy Fish #28 7-5 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —