H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 3-5

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–3 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 5–2 on hard courts, while David Ferrer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 7-5 6-0.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Ferrer #6 7-5 6-0 Mikhail Youzhny #25 Match data
Oct 27, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 F Hard Mikhail Youzhny #21 6-3 7-5 David Ferrer #3 Match data
Jun 2, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay David Ferrer #6 6-0 6-2 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #52 7-6(3) 6-2 David Ferrer #19 Match data
Feb 13, 2009* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #62 6-2 3-6 6-2 David Ferrer #14 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #22 6-2 7-5 David Ferrer #15 Match data
Sep 3, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #54 4-6 6-4 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #13 Match data
Oct 15, 2003* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #72 1-6 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27