H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Ferrer vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 15-1
David Ferrer holds a 15–1 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 9–1 on clay and 6–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 Buenos Aires semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
15
–
1
16 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2016* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 7-5 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2014* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | David Ferrer | 4-6 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2012* | Valencia | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2012* | Bastad | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| May 11, 2012* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(8) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2011* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2011* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2011* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2009* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2008* | Valencia | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2007* | Bastad | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Ferrer | 7-6(1) 7-6(6) 6-1 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2006* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | David Ferrer | 4-6 7-6(1) 6-0 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |