H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-1

David Ferrer holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass David Ferrer #11 6-4 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #178 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay David Ferrer #14 6-3 5-7 6-4 3-6 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #37 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #25 6-3 6-1 David Ferrer #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —