H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 2-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–2 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2013 Doha semifinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2013* Doha ATP 250 SF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #44 6-2 6-3 David Ferrer #5 Match data
Nov 5, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #36 Match data
Aug 20, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 4-6 6-3 7-5 David Ferrer #11 Match data
Jul 25, 2009* Hamburg ATP 500 SF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #12 7-5 7-6(2) David Ferrer #23 Match data
Aug 18, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-2 6-4 David Ferrer #15 Match data
Oct 2, 2004* Palermo ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #51 6-2 2-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —