H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 0-2

Paul-Henri Mathieu holds a 2–0 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul-Henri Mathieu won the 2009 Rome Masters second round 6-3 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Paul-Henri Mathieu #35 6-3 2-6 6-2 David Ferrer #14 Match data
Jun 28, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Paul-Henri Mathieu #39 6-3 6-4 6-3 David Ferrer #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —