H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 6-3

David Ferrer holds a 6–3 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 7-5 6-3.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2015* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #8 7-5 6-3 Radek Stepanek #278 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #6 7-6(4) 6-2 Radek Stepanek #26 Match data
Oct 8, 2011* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 6-2 7-6(3) Radek Stepanek #24 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Radek Stepanek #23 7-5 7-5 3-6 4-6 6-4 David Ferrer #21 Match data
Jun 3, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-2 1-6 6-3 6-3 Radek Stepanek #22 Match data
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #27 4-6 6-2 6-1 David Ferrer #5 Match data
Aug 16, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #15 6-2 7-5 Radek Stepanek #36 Match data
Jan 21, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard David Ferrer #14 6-7(5) 4-6 6-0 6-4 6-3 Radek Stepanek #20 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Carpet Radek Stepanek #64 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5