H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Ferrer vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-2
Robin Haase holds a 2–1 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robin Haase leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2019 Auckland third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2019* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-1 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2017* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Robin Haase | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2017* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Haase | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | David Ferrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Robin Haase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |