H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Ferrer vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 4-0
David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Australian Open second round 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Ferrer | 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 28, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-1 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 6, 2011* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-3 7-6(3) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | David Ferrer | 7-6(6) 6-3 1-3 (ret.) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Ferrer | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |