H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Ferrer vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 4-0

David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Australian Open second round 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Ferrer #10 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-2 Sergiy Stakhovsky #71 Match data Jan 22, 2015* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
David Ferrer #7 6-1 6-1 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #36 Match data May 28, 2011* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Ferrer #6 6-3 7-6(3) Sergiy Stakhovsky #38 Match data May 6, 2011* R16 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
David Ferrer #5 7-6(6) 6-3 1-3 (ret.) Sergiy Stakhovsky #135 Match data Jun 25, 2008* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Ferrer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
29 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0%
35 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2021 1 2 3 33.3%
36 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
37 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
Career 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Ferrer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 —/— 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 —/— 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0% 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6% 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3% 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6% 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
36 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5% —/—
37 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7% —/—
Career 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3% 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Ferrer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% 0.0% -4.50 -0.01
19 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) +0.25
20 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% +85 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 +0.80 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 -0.41
21 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) -2.35 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% 0.0% -2.75 +0.11
22 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) +0.43 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 -0.41
23 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) +1.45 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) +1.40
24 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) +1.00 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) -0.67
25 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) -0.11 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) +0.79
26 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) +2.27 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) -1.40
27 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) +0.88 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) -0.19
28 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) +0.59 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) -0.26
29 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) +1.39 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) -0.06
30 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) +1.07 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) -0.26
31 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) +1.12 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) -0.83
32 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) +2.77 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.05
33 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) +3.35 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.66
34 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) +1.83 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% 0.0% -3.00 -0.10
35 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) +0.54 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 +0.06
36 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) -0.57 2022 1516 98.8
37 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) -0.85
Career 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.