H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 7-1

David Ferrer holds a 7–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–1 on clay and 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Beijing third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 2015* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #7 6-4 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #31 Match data
Jan 21, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Ferrer #10 6-7(2) 6-2 6-0 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #65 Match data
Oct 25, 2014* Valencia ATP 250 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 6-1 6-2 Thomaz Bellucci #58 Match data
Feb 22, 2014* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 QF Clay David Ferrer #4 4-6 6-3 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #130 Match data
Apr 18, 2012* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Thomaz Bellucci #45 6-3 6-2 David Ferrer #6 Match data
Oct 13, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #10 7-6(7) 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #25 Match data
Apr 24, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay David Ferrer #17 6-4 6-0 Thomaz Bellucci #33 Match data
Feb 25, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Clay David Ferrer #17 6-4 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 — — — — — — —
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 — — — — — — —
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —